Friday, August 26, 2011

Bilal bin Rabah visiting the grave of Prophet

The Athar

Once Bilal ra beheld the Prophet (s.a.w.) in his dream saying to him:

"O Bilal! How is it that you never visit me." No sooner did he get up that he set out for Madinah. On reaching there, Hassan and Hussain (r.a.), the Prophet's grandsons, requested him to call out the Azaan. He could not refuse them, for they were very dear to him. But as soon as the Azaan was called, the people of Madinah cried openly out of their anguish at the memory of the happy old days of the Prophet's time. Even the women came out of their houses weeping. Bilal (r.a.) left Madinah again after a few days and died in Damascus in 20 A.H.[Subki in his book Shifa' al-Siqam page 52]

Response:

a) Hafiz ad-Dahabee said after quoting the narration
إسناده لين وهو منكر .
There is weakness in the chain and it is Munkar [Seyar Ailam an-Nubala]
.
Scan: http://ia600208.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/15/items/siar_noblaa/01_jp2.zip&file=01_jp2/01_0357.jp2&scale=2&rotate=0
.
b) Hafiz Ibn Abdul Hadi who is student of Hafiz ad-Dahabee and teacher of Ibn Rajab Hanbalee refuted as-Subki by saying it is not proven and if for the sake of an argument it is proven then it is not evidence for visiting the graves [Sarim al-Munki page no: 314]
.
c) Hafiz Ibn Hajar asqalani said "This story is a clear fabrication"[Lisan al-Mizan 1/107-108]
.
d) Shokani said there is no base of this story [Al-Fawaid al Majmooa page 40]
.
e) Abu Abdul Rahman al-Fawzi mentioned this story in his book the famous stories and their reality

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Taraweeh

Introduction
Usually I do not pay attention to these issues of fiqh because Salaf of this ummah differed in this case. , I would like to quote the stance of ahlus sunnah i.e This is the issue of fiqh and we should not be too rigid, Ahlus sunnah are against those few people of subcontinent who claim that 8 rakah are started by scholars of 14th century, Because Taraweeh is 8 rakah is the stance of many classical scholars for example


Abul Abbas Qurtubee (d 656 h) Rahimullah said
There is difference of opinion among the scholars regarding the Qiyam, Imam Malik said it is 36 rakah.....

وقال كثير من أهل العلم :إحدىٰ عشرة ركعة أخذاً بحديث عائشة
A large number of people of knowledge have said that it is 11 Rakaah and the evidence is the hadeeth of Aisha (Radhi Allahu Anha)".[Al Mufim min Talkhees Kitab Sahih Muslim 2/390]
Scan: http://ia700508.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/3/items/Almufhim_pdf_Islamic_book/mfhim2_jp2.zip&file=mfhim2_jp2/mfhim2_0389.jp2&scale=4&rotate=0


The Opinion of The Four Imams

1) Imam Abu Haneefa Rahimullah
Imam Muhammad bin Hasan Shaybani said: “ Abu Haneefah informed us, who said, it was narrated to us by Abu Jafar, who said the Prophet would pray thirteen raka’aahs between Salaatul-Ishaa and the Fajar Prayer, eight raka’aahs being voluntarily, three raka’aahs being Witr, and two raka’aahs (sunnah) of the Fajar Prayer
Abdul Hai Lakhnawi said regarding 8 rakah that it is tahajjud .”[Muwatta Imam Muhammad, On the Issue of performing Salaam concluding with the Witr with the commentary of Abdul Hai Lakhnawi Hanafi]
Scan
http://ia700209.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/13/items/tahlikelmoumajed/elkanaoui02_jp2.zip&file=elkanaoui02_jp2/elkanaoui02_0013.jp2&scale=4&rotate=0
The hadeeth of Aisha which states 8+3 Rakaah was Practice of Prophet peace be upon him is also mentioned in Muwatta Muhammad bin Al Hassan As-Shaybaani under the heading
"قيام شهر رمضان و ماء فيه من الفضل”

Shaykh Abdul Hayy Lakhnavi hanafi states in its Haashiya that “قوله قيام شهر رمضان ويسمى التراويح” which means that standing in the month of Ramadhan means Taraweeh .

Scan:
http://ia700209.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=%2F13%2Fitems%2Ftahlikelmoumajed%2Felkanaoui01_jp2.zip&file=elkanaoui01_jp2%2Felkanaoui01_0617.jp2&scale=4&rotate=0

Al-Sarkhasi Hanafi said:
فإنها عشرون ركعة سوى الوتر عندنا .
It is twenty rak’ahs, apart from Witr, in our view. [

Al-Mabsoot, 2/145]


2) Imam Malik Rahimullah

Imam Malik said

الذي آخذ به لنفسي في قيام رمضان هو الذي جمع به عمر بن الخطاب الناس إحدىٰ عشرة ركعة وهي صلاة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم و لا أدري من أحدث هذا الركوع الكثير
I choose 11 Rakah of standing in Ramadhan and Umar bin al Khattab Gathered people on this prayer and this is the Prayer of Messenger of Allah peace be upon him, and I don't know from where people innovated these so many more Rak`ah [Kitab Al tahajjud hadeeth no: 890 by Abdul Haq Al Shabeeli (d 581 h)]
Right after that Abdul Haq Shabeeli quoted narration of Ibn al-Qasim from Imam Malik that taraweeh is 36 rakah but that is not authentic see [Kitab al-Duafa Abi Zura al-Razi page no: 534]
This is stance of Imam Malik is quoted by Allamah Ayini Hanafi, he said
وقيل إحدى عشرة ركعة وهو اختيار مالك لنفسه واختيار أبي بكر بن العربي.
“it is said that the taraweeh is 11 rakah. and Imam Malik and Abu Bakar al-Arabi chooses these rakah for themselves” [Umda tul qari 11/126 under the hadeeth 2010]


Qazi Abu Bakr Al-Arbi Al-Maaliki[468 h to 543 h] said:
والصحيح أن يصلي إحدى عشرة ركعة صلاة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وقيامه ، فأما غير ذلك من الأعداد فلا أصل له ولا حدّ فيه
And the correct (view) is that 11 rakaat should be prayed. This was the prayer and Qiyaam of the prophet sal Allahu aleyhi wasallam. Any numbers apart from that has no reality in it and Hadd in it.[عارضة الأحوذي 4/19 ح806]


According to Shaykh Ibne Tamiyah stance of Malaki Madhab is 36 Rakah or 11 or 13 rakah as said by Shaykh in Al-Ikhtiyaaraat, p. 64

3) Imam Shafee Rahimullah

Imam Shafi Rahimullah said that 20 is better and said
أذهب إلى عشرون ركعة قال: وليس في شيء من هنا حد ينتهي إليه؛ لأنه نافلة فإن أطالوا القيام وأقلوا السجود فحسن، وهو أحب إلي، وإن أكثروا الركوع فحسن.
There is no problem in this (prayer) and there is no limit, because this is nafil prayer, If Rakat are less and Qiyam is long then it is good and i like this view, and If There are More Rak`ah even that is good.[Mukhtasir Qayam ul Layl al Maroozi page 222]

4) Imam Ahmad bin Humble Rahimullah
Ishaq bin Mansoor asked him regarding Rakah of Qayam , Imam Ahmad said
قد قيل فيه ألوان نحواً من أربعين ، إنما هو تطو

40 Raka`ah are narrated in this case, this is only nafil prayer[Mukhtasir qiyam al layl page 222]

Imam Tirmidhee in his Sunan said that Imam Ahmad did not set the number of Rakah “ولم يقض فيه بشيء”

In Short

Our approach should be linient because there is difference of opinion, no one has the right to say 8 rakah was started by the scholars of 14th century, below is the difference

1. Traweeh is 11 or 13 rakah and their evidence is the hadeeth of Aisha ra,Jabir ra and the athaar of Umar ra, This is one of the opinion of Imam Malik, Abu Bakar al-Arabi, Abul Abbas Qurtubee and scholars like sh-Al-Bani and Abdul Mannan Noorpuri etc.

2. Taraweeh is 20 rakah and their evidence is the fabricated hadeeth of Prophet peace be upon him, authentic athaar of Sahaba, this is the opinion of Imam Shafiee who even said praying more rakah is also allowed and less rakah is also allowed, This is the opinion of Ibn Qudamah and Hanafi school etc.

3. One can pray as much as you want because the hadeeth says 'The night prayers are Two by two, then when you fear that dawn is about to break, pray Witr with one rak’ah” in this hadeeth Prophet peace be upon him did not set the number of the rakah. This is the opinion of Imam Ahmad, Imam Ibn Tamiyah, sh Abul Aziz Ibn Baz, sh Muhammad bin Saalih Ibn Uthaymeen etc.

Brothers should understand this issue and see all the evidences of all the groups and then conclude. And Allah knows best

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Imam Ibn Khuzaima and Asking help from the dead

Introduction:

Some people of Innovation quote one of the statement from Tehzeeb at-Tahzeeb of Ibn Hajar to prove that Imam Ibn Khuzaimah(223h - 311h) did believe in asking the help from dead (Naudhubilah). Below is what they quote:

Ibn Hajar asqalani said

قال (الحاكم النيسابوري) وسمعت أبا بكر محمد بن المؤمل بن الحسن

بن عيسى يقول خرجنا مع امام أهل الحديث أبي بكر بن خزيمة وعديله

أبي علي الثقفي مع جماعة من مشائخنا وهم إذ ذاك متوافرون إلى زيارة

قبر علي بن موسى الرضى بطوس قال فرأيت من تعظيمه يعنى ابن خزيمة

لتلك البقعة وتواضعه لها وتضرعه عندها ما تحيرنا.

Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn al-Mo'amal bin al-Hasan bin Esa said: We accompanied Imam of Ahlul Hadeeth Abi Bakr ibn Khuzaima, Abi Ali al-Thaqafi and a group of scholars on a visit to the grave of Ali ibn Musa al- Rida in Toos. I was astonished by the respect shown by Ibn Khuzaima towards it.[Tehzeeb at tahzeeb 7/339]

Response

From this quote some people try to deduce that Imam Ibn Khuzaimah (223 - 311 Hijri) believed in asking help from the dead, Leaving a side chain of the narrators of this narration let us see the text.

There is nothing wrong in the text because no where it says he asked help from Imam Ali bin Musa Rahimullah, or prostate there or kissed the grave or something like that. It just says he showed his respect. This is the belief of Ahlus sunnah that one should respect the graves of the Muslim like Prophet peace be upon him and the sahaba did. Here is the proof of my claim:

Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Tamiyah said

فإن قبر المسلم له من الحرمة ما جاءت به السنة إذ هو بيت المسلم الميت فلا يترك عليه شيء من النجاسات بالاتفاق ولا يوطأ ولا يداس ولا يتكأ عليه عندنا وعند جمهور العلماء ولا يجاور بما يؤذي الأموات من الأقوال والأفعال الخبيثة ويستحب عند إتيانه السلام على صاحبه والدعاء له وكلما كان الميت أفضل كان حقه أوكد
The
sanctity of the grave of Muslim is sunnah because the grave is the house of the dead Muslim.. [ Iqtida’ al-Siraat al-Mustaqeem page 339 and page 111 of urdu translation published by Dar us salam]

Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Humayd said

It is not permissible to interfere with graves in any way so long as any remains of the dead are still to be found in them. The sanctity of the dead is like the sanctity of the living. So it is not permissible to subject graves to any disrespect, whether by stepping on them, making them pathways, praying in the graveyard, or making them part of people’s dwelling-places. None of these things are allowed, unless the occupants of the graves have turned to dust and there is nothing left of their bodies. In that case, it is OK to use the graveyards for fields or houses or other purposes. But so long as any trace of the dead bodies are left, it is not permissible to use them or walk on them, because the dead Muslim came to this place before you; he got there first so he has more right to it. His sanctity when he is dead is the same as his sanctity when he was alive. When the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) saw a man step on a grave, he said: “If one of you were to sit on a live coal that burned his garment and reached his skin, that would be better for him than sitting on a grave.” (Narrated by Muslim, 9711; Abu Dawood, 3228). This is a warning, because of the disrespect towards that Muslim that is involved. The scholars stated that it is haraam to relieve oneself in between graves, and that it is not permitted to sit on a grave, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Do not sit on graves, and do not pray towards them.” (Narrated by Muslim, no. 972; Abu Dawood, no. 3229). We should not lean on graves, or step on them, or show any disrespect towards them; all of that is not allowed. And Allaah is the Source of strength.[From Fataawa al-Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Humayd, p. 161,Islam qa fatwa no: 4309]

Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid said

Hence the teachings of Islam are different from the teachings of other nations; they include treating the deceased with respect and in a manner that will benefit him. Allaah has prescribed for us that when a Muslim dies, we should wash him and cleanse him, then shroud him in a white cloth, then we should offer the funeral prayer for him and pray for mercy and forgiveness for him. Then after that we must bury him and cover him with earth, then we should visit the graves and pray for their Muslim occupants.[Islam QA fatwa no: 9089]

Fataawa Islamiyaah says

The sanctity of the dead among the Muslims is like the sanctity of the living. May Allaah bless our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions. [Al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah Fataawa Islamiyyah, 3/22]

Imam Ibn Khuzaimah (223 - 311 Hijri) himself said

أفليس العلم محيطاً يا ذوى الحجا أنه غير جائز أن يأمر النبي بالتعوذ بخلق الله من شر خلقه هل سمعتم عالماً يجيز أن يقول الداعي أعوذ بالكعبة من شر خلق الله ، أو يجيز أن يقول أعوذ بالصفا والمروة أو أعوذ بعرفات ومنى من شر ما خلق الله هذا لا يقوله ولا يجيز القول به مسلم يعرف دين الله محال أن يستعيذ مسلم بخلق الله من شر خلقه
Isn't it well known that it is not allowed by Prophet's(peace be upon him) command to seek refuge in Creation from evil of the Creation?, Have you ever heard any scholar allowing in Dua to say: "I seek refuge in Kaaba from evil of Creation of Allah or I seek refuge in Safa & Marwa or Arafat or Mina from the evil of the Creation of Allah?" No one said this and it is not allowed for Muslim who knows the deen of Allah to seek refuge in Creation from the evil of Creation.[Kitab at tawheed of Ibne Khuzaimah 1/401]

Scan:http://images.orkut.com/orkut/photos/PQAAAI_VFo_MgUCuhSwMg4H_FxFLqeuDt5qQPaMe71EAQIo8PqDZAua_2vi5dqCBfmsxIaJcpS979_cTqtUHa5itUmsAm1T1UJu3pGQheE5glVhqhKm2qEql6qnT.jpg

http://images.orkut.com/orkut/photos/PQAAAO5i4yK8LX3sH0TgjYKb0oZNOB4ood7yJSNsp5zBB6nBPwEYM_JJqeAhXh4kewkcyHU4Y0LyeVaaQMtJRR_PMwAAm1T1UKL2OiEB_vFRXyI46uN-f5tvNNjM.jpg

a very Important Note: Some people of subcontinent (Brelvis) say that the people of Sunnah (Wahabis according to the brelvis) do not respect the Prophet peace be upon him, which is totally false accusation, let me quote two Fatawas.

Allah says

“Verily, We have sent you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) as a witness, as a bearer of glad tidings, and as a warner.

9. In order that you (O mankind) may believe in Allaah and His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم), and that you assist and honour him (صلى الله عليه وسلم), and (that you) glorify (Allaah’s) praises morning and afternoon”

[al-Fath 48:8,9]

a) Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

و من ذلك : أن الله أمر بتعزيره فقال : ( وتعزِّروه وتوقروه )الفتح/ 9 ، والتعزير : اسم جامع لنصره ، وتأييده ، ومنعه من كل ما يؤذيه
والتوقير : اسم جامع لكل ما فيه سكينة ، وطمأنينة ، من الإجلال والإكرام ، وأن يعامَل من التشريف ، والتكريم ، والتعظيم بما يصونه عن كل ما يخرجه عن حدِّ الوقار .

Allaah has enjoined assisting him, as He says “and that you assist and honour him”. Ta’zeer (assisting) means helping him, supporting him and protecting him against everything that may offend him.

Honouring refers to everything in which there is tranquillity and peace of mind, such as honour and respect, and dealing with him with the utmost respect and dignity

Al-Saarim al-Maslool (1/425).

Respecting and honouring him is not limited to his lifetime (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), rather it is also required after his death.

b) Al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

واعلم أن حرمة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم بعد موته ، وتوقيره ، وتعظيمه : لازم ، كما كان حال حياته ، وذلك عند ذكره صلى الله عليه وسلم ، وذكر حديثه ، وسنته ، وسماع اسمه ، وسيرته ، ومعاملة آله ، وعترته ، وتعظيم أهل بيته ، وصحابته

It should be noted that revering, respecting and venerating the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is required after his death, just as it was required during his lifetime, by showing respect when his name, is mentioned, (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), when you hear his hadeeth and Sunnah, when reading his seerah (biography); it also includes showing respect to the members of his household and his companions.

Al-Shifa fi Ahwaal al-Mustafa (2/40).

Comment: Respect does not mean to ask help from Prophet peace be upon him, Kissing his Nobel Grave, Praying towards it, Making it the place of gatherings etc. The scholars of Ahlus sunnah understood the deen better then the people of subcontinent (Brelvis)

Conclusion: It is clear that showing any disrespect towards the grave of the Muslim is prohibited, his sanctity when he is dead is the same as his sanctity when he was alive and Imam Ibn Khuzaimah rahimullah is himself against seeking refuge from the evil from the creation.


Monday, August 8, 2011

Fatwas on the hadeeth of 73 sects

1) Ibn Rushd,(520 h to 595 h) said in his book “Manahijul Adillah Fee ‘Aqaadil Millah" page 150:

وهذه هي حال الفرق الحادثة في الشريعة مع الشريعة ، وذلك أن كل فرقة منهم تأولت في الشريعة تأويلاً غير التأويل الذي تأولته الفرقة الأخرى ، وزعمت أنه الذي قصده صاحب الشرع ، حتى تمزق الشرع كل ممزق ، وبعُد جداً عن موضوعه الأول ، ولما علم صاحب الشرع أن مثل هذا يعرض ولا بد في شريعته قال : "ستفترق أمتي على ثنتين وسبعين فرقة كلها في النار إلا واحدة" يعني بالواحدة : التي سلكت ظاهر الشرع ولم تؤوله ، وأنت إذا تأملت ما عرض في هذه الشريعة في هذا الوقت من الفساد العارض فيها من قبل التأويل تبينت أن هذا المثال صحيح ، وأول من غير هذا الدواء الأعظم هم:

الخوارج ، ثم المعتزلة بعدهم ، ثم الأشعرية ، ثم الصوفية ، ثم جاء أبو حامد فطم الوادي على القرى

This was the status of innovated sects with respect to Shari'ah. Each of these sects misunderstood Shari’ah in a way different than the other sects, claiming their understanding to be the objective of the Legislator. This tore the Shari’ah to several pieces, and distanced it from its original position.

The Legislator knew that this was likely to occur so He said: My nation will devide into 73 sects, all will be in the hell fire, except for one”. He meant by this "one" the sect which goes by the apparent verses of Shari'ah and does not misunderstand them.

When you look at the amount of deviation that has occurred in the Ummah during this time, you will find that most of it was due to misunderstanding.

And the first to modify this great cure were: al-Khawarij, then Mu’tazilites, then Ash’aris, then Sufis. Then came Abu Hamed who caused the valley to landslide over the villages.

Scan: http://images.orkut.com/orkut/photos/PQAAACSDo1HjgqjFdYhAYI_rMqHuhauGcXJ36ZtoYhWv3cl71rS8UBv1K7f8CJRJ7v4P__npOvk45jHsxkHGwRI2V6YAm1T1UEDsvUF807eypHR_aHwMay0on7qO.jpg

2) Fatwa from The Permanent Committee for Islaamic Research and Fataawa
Question: What is the meaning of the following hadeeth:

((My ummah will be divided into seventy three sects. All of them will be in the Fire except one?)),

Who is that sect ? And will the seventy two sects live forever in the Fire, as the mushrik will or not? And does the term "ummah" of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) apply to thos who follow him as well as those who do not, or is it to the former only?

Response: What is meant by the term "ummah" in this hadeeth is the ummah of response (ummatul-ijaabah - those who responded to the call to Islaam after having been invited), which shall be divided into seventy three sects; seventy two of which are deviant, who practice innovated religious practices that do not constitute apostacy. Each shall be punished in accordance to the innovations and deviation (it practiced), except for those who Allaah pardons and forgives. Their final abode will be Jannah. The only sect that will be safe is Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah, who adhere to the Sunnah of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and hold fast to what he and his companions (radhi-yallaahu 'anhum) were holding to. It is they about whom the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) said:

((A group of my ummah shall remain steadfast, on the truth, victorious, unharmed by those who oppose them, and do not support them, until the death or until the Day of Resurrection)), [Saheeh al-Bukhaaree, nos.71 and 3641, and Saheeh Muslim, no.1920]

As for those whose innovation casts them out of Islaam, they belong to the ummah of invitation (ummatud-da'wah - those to whom the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) was sent to invite to Islaam), not the ummatul-ijaabah. They shall remain in the Hell Fire forever, and this is the most valid opinion.

It is also said that the term "ummah" in this hadeeth means ummatud-da'wah, which is a general term indicating all those to whom the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) was sent (i.e. mankind) those who believe and those who do not believe. Whereas the term "the saved sect" is the ummatul-ijaabah, which strictly applies to those who believe in the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam), truthfully and die in such a state (of belief). This is the sect that whill be saved from the Fire; either by prior punishment or without prior punishment, and their final abode will beJannah, (inshaa.-Allaah).

As for the seventy two sects (in the second opinion) they are all, excluding the saved sect, disbelievers who will live forever in the Fire. Hence, it is clear that the ummatud-da'wah is more general in connotation than the ummatul-ijaabah. That is to say, whoever belongs to the ummatul-ijaabah belongs to the ummatud-da'wah, while not everyone of the ummatud-da'wah belongs to the ummatul-ijaabah.

And with Allaah lies all success and may Allaah send prayers and salutations upon our Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and his family and his companions.

Fataawa Islaamiyyah - Volume 1, Page 16

http://www.fatwa-online.com/fataawa/creed/faith/0020115_1.htm

3) Shaykh Muhammad al-Hassan Walid Dido al-Shanqiti was asked

Are the sects that are mentioned by the Prophet in the adīth to remain in the hellfire forever? And is there any way in which it is possible for the Ahl al-Sunna to be united with them?

The Answer

The statement of the Prophet that, "The Jews splintered into seventy one sects, the Christians splintered into seventy two sects and my Umma will splinter into seventy three sects," this much of the adīth is authentic. It has been transmitted by al-ākim [al-Naysābūrī (d. 405 AH)] and others, and it is authentic in its various narrations. As for the additional phrase (ziyāda), namely, "all of them are in the hellfire except one," or, "all of them are in Heaven except one," or "whoever [follows] what I and my Companions [follow...]," all of these additional phrases are inauthentic. Thus the authentic adīth is only the affirmation [that there will exist] sects, and this is one of the signs of prophethood [of Muammad, and one of its proofs. But as for their being "in the hellfire," or "in Heaven," or, [following] what he and his Companions [follow]; none of these [variant narrations] has authentically reached us from the Prophet.

As for the sects within this Umma, they are those which [promote] reprehensible innovations and misguidance within the faith, and whose followers are not disbelievers [in Islam]—for whoever dies testifying that there is no god but God and that Muammad is the Messenger of God will not remain in the hellfire forever, even if they were misguided and an innovator, however great their disobedience may be. Rather God will either forgive them, or punish them to the extent that they have disobeyed Him, and then He will take them out of the hellfire. Indeed God will bring forth groups of people on the Day of Resurrection who have become blackened and scorched [in the hellfire] and cast them into the River of Life. [Therein] their bodies shall sprout as a seed of a desert plant sprouts in the dross of a torrent, and then they shall be entered into Heaven.Additionally, they may be punished in their graves—and the punishment of the grave is one of the means of expiating sins [...]—such that when they are brought forth on the Day of Resurrection, they will already have been recompensed for their innovation and sin.

Source of the fatwa of Sh Shanqiti http://www.suhaibwebb.com/islam-studies/faqs-and-fatwas/shaykh-al-dedo-on-the-sects-of-the-umma-translated-by-u-abdullah/


4) Fatwa of Al Allaamah Al Imaam Muhammad bin Saalih al-'Uthaimeen

“Will The 72 Astray Groups Remain In The Fire?”

Source: Fatwa taken from: ﻟﻘﺎءات اﻟﺒﺎب اﻟﻤﻔﺘﻮح.

Translated by Abu Abdis Siddiq Salaam al-Juyaanee.

As Shaikh Al Allaamah Al Imaam Muhammad bin Saalih al-'Uthaimeen (rahimahullah) was asked, "In the hadeeth, “My Ummah will divide into 73 groups all of them will be in the fire except one.”[Hadeeth reported by at-Tirmidhi]


Will they (the 72) groups be in the fire forever or are they from the astray groups from amongst the Muslims?"


The Shaikh (rahimahullah) answered,


"The Prophet (alaihis salaatu wasallam’s) statement, My Ummah will divide into 73 groups; all of them will be in the fire except one", does not mean that they all will be in the fire forever. Rather some (of them) commit bid'ah which warrants their staying in the fire, while (others commit) bid'ah which will make the servant deserving of entering the fire but he will not stay therein for eternity. So the situation will all depend on the (type of) bid'ah which is committed and the extent of the differing from that which the Prophet (salallahu alaihi wasallam) and his companions were upon."


It was then asked, "One of them will be in Jannah”; does this mean that a man from Firqatun Naajiyyah (the victorious group) will never enter the fire?"


The Shaikh (rahimahullah) then answered,


"(Either) he would not enter the fire or, he would enter the fire but not remain therein forever." It was then asked, "How do we understand this?"


The Shaikh (rahimahullah) said,


"We say for example, people (Muslims) are of four categories (with regards to this issue),


The First: An innovator who commits a bid'ah that is mukaffirah (which takes one outside of Islam). And he has absolutely no Sunnah with him. So this one will remain in the fire, and there is no difficulty in this (i.e. with regards to his ruling).


The Second: An innovator who commits a bid'ah that is mufassiqah (which does not take one outside of Islam). So this one deserves to enter the fire but he will not stay therein forever.


The Third: A pure Sunni (Salafee), this one will enter into Jannah and does not deserve to enter the fire. And if he were to enter it (the fire) due to some other sin, then he would not stay therein forever.


The Fourth: A Sunni (Salafee), who has mixed both good and bad deeds. This one deserves to enter the fire but would not stay therein forever.” (end quote)

Source:

http://www.assalafi.com/Articles/Fiqh/72astraygroups.pdf


5) Shaykh Suhaib Hasan said

17. Numerous narrations of this hadith are found in the collections of Abu Dawud, al-Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, al-Hakim, Ahmad and others: they vary in being sahih, hasan, or da'if, but the hadith is established. Among those who have authenticated this hadith are al-Tirmidhi, al- Hakim, al-Shatibi, Ibn Taimiyyah, Ibn al-Qayyim, al-Dhahabi, Ibn Kathir, Ibn Hajar and al-'Iraqi. Most narrations mention the splitting-up of the Jews and the Christians into seventy-one or seventy-two sects, all being in the Fire except one, prior to mention of the Muslims dividing even more. In some of the narrations, the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) describes the Saved Sect variously as "the Jama'ah (community, congregation, main body)", "the largest body (al-sawad al-a'zam)" and "that which follows what I and my Companions are upon." The hadith does not mean that the majority of Muslims will be in the Hellfire, for most of them ("the masses") are not involved in intentional, divisive innovation; further, mention of the Fire does not necessarily imply that the seventy-two sects will remain there forever, or that those sects are disbelievers.

http://www.islamicawakening.com/viewarticle.php?articleID=73&pageID=352

6) Ahmad al-Sirhindi the sufi (d. 1034) said in his Maktubat (Vol. 3, Letter 38):

"It was declared in a Hadith that this Ummah would part into 73 groups, 72 of which would go to Hell. This Hadith informs us that the 72 groups will be tormented in the Fire of Hell. It does not inform us that they will remain in torment eternally. Remaining in the torment of Hell Fire eternally is for those who do not have Iman. That is, it is for disbelievers. The 72 groups, on account of their corrupt beliefs, will go to Hell and will burn as much as the corruptness of their beliefs. One group, the 73rd, will be saved from Hell Fire because their belief is not corrupt. If among the members of this one group there are those who committed evil deeds and if these evil deeds of theirs have not been forgiven through repentance or intercession, it is possible that these, too, will burn in Hell as much as their sins. All of those who are in the 72 groups will go to Hell. But none of them will remain in Hell eternally. Not all of those who are in this one group will go to Hell. Of these only those who have committed evil deeds will go to Hell. The 72 reported groups of bid'ah, which will go to Hell, should not be called disbelievers, because they are Ahl al-Qibla (people of the Qibla in prayer). But, of these, the ones who disbelieve those facts in the Deen that are indispensably required to be believed, as well as those who deny the rules of the Shari'ah which every Muslim has heard and knows, become disbelievers."