Sunday, May 15, 2011

Asking from dead is Shirk from Quran,Sunnah and Ijma Part 3

  • Ibne Jozi said:
فطهر لهذا أن أصل عبادة الأوثان والأصنام من تعظيم قبور الأولياء والصالحين ولهذا نهى الشارع صلى الله عليه وسلم عن تعظبم القبور والصلاة عندها والعكوف عليها فان ذلك هو الذى أوقع الأمم الماضية بالشرك الأكبر
It is apparent from that idol and asnam worship started due to veneration of graves of Auliya and righteous people, That's why Shaa're (Prophet) Peace be upon him forbade veneration of graves, praying near them and sitting on them. For, verily because of this thing previous generations started shirk al-Akbar.
تذكرة اولى البصائر page 21 Publishers (Dar Ibne Katheer Beruit Taba 1424)

ولهذا نجد ايضا فى هذا الزمان أقواما من الضلال الذين استحوذ عليهم الشيطان يتضرعون عند القبور و عند سماع ذكر مشايخهم و يخشعون عندها و يعبدونهم بقلوبهم عبادة لا يفعلونها فى المسجد و لا فى السحر ومنهم من يسجد للقبر فهذا هو شرك بالله نعوذ بالله منه
Because of this today we find ignorant people; Satan took over them, they mourn when they mention graves and scholars, they submit their selves and they worship with their hearts which they don't practice in mosque and suhur. And some of them prostrate on graves this is shirk with Allah we seek refuge with Allah with it
تذكرة اولى البصائر page 21 Publishers (Dar Ibne Katheer Beruit Taba 1424)

ومن ذلك الاستغاثة بهم فى قضاء حوائجهم والحلف بهم والتواجد عند ذكرهم مالا يفعلونها عند ذكر الله وسماع آياته فيمن استعان بغير او استغاثه كما يقول هؤلاء المتولهون بالمشايخ يا سبدى فلان فقد اشرك مع الله غيره
Asking help for the needs from Scholars and Auliyah is included in the shirk and taking oath on their names... who ever ask help from other then Allah or call upon them as they say in veneration for scholars O my leader O My shaykh so and so (Ya Sayyadi Ya Sayyadi Fulaan).. so he associated other partner with Alllah
تذكرة اولى البصائر page 22 Publishers
(Dar Ibne Katheer Beruit Taba 1424)

  • Shaikh Fakhruddeen Aboo Sa’d ‘Uthmaan al-Jiyaanee ibn Sulaymaan al-Hanafee said in a treatise of his:

ومن ظن أن الميت يتصرف في الأمور دون الله واعتقد بذلك كفر . كذا في البحر الرائق وقال القاضي حميد الدين تاكوري الهندي في ( التوشيح ) : ( منهم الذين يدعون الأنبياء والأولياء عند الحوائج والمصائبباعتقاد أن أرواحهم حاضرة تسمع النداء وتعلم الحوائج وذلك شرك قبيح وجهل صريح قال الله تعالى : { ومن أضل ممن يدعو من دون الله من لا يستجيب له إلى يوم القيامة وهم عن دعائهم غافلون } [ الأحقاف : 5 ]وفي البحر : لو تزوج بشهادة الله ورسوله لا ينعقد النكاح ويكفر لاعتقاده أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يعلم الغيب وهكذا في فتاوى قاضي خان والعيني والدر المختار والعالمكيرية وغيرها من كتب الحنفية وأماالآيات الكرمية والسنة المطهرة في إبطال أساس الشرك والتوبيخ لفاعله فأكثر من أن تحصى

“Whoever thinks that any dead person has any control over the affairs besides Allaah, and he believes that, then he is an Unbeliever.” This is what is mentioned in Al-Bahrur-Raaiq. al-Qaadee Hameeduddeen Naakoree al-Hindee said in at-Tawsheeh: “From them are those who supplicate to the prophets and the pious when they have a need or are in distress, believing that their spirits are present and hear their call and know of their needs. This is vile shirk and clear ignorance, Allaah, the Most High, says:

“And who is more astray than one who calls (invokes) besides Allaah, such as will not answer him till the Dayof Resurrection, and who are (even) unaware of their calls (invocations) to them?”

In al-Bahr (3/94) there occurs: “If such a person marries, attesting his belief in Allaah and His Messenger, then the marriage is not correct. Rather he is an Unbeliever due to his belief that the prophet knows the Hidden and Unseen."

Its like occurs in the Fataawaa of Qaadee Khaan, al-‘Aynee, ad- Durrul-Mukhtaar, al-‘Aalamgeeriyyah and other books by the Hanafee scholars, Then as for the Noble Aayaat and sayings in the pure Sunnah in refutation of the foundations of shirk, and in pure rebuke of those guilty of it, then they are too many to be counted(end)

  • Ash-Shaikh Abu Tayyib Shamsul-Haqq al-‘Azeemabaadee said in Al-Ta’leeq al- Mughnee ‘alaa Sunan Daaraqutnee (pp.520-521):

ومن أقبح المنكرات وأكبر البدعات وأعظم المحدثات ما اعتاده أهل البدع من ذكر الشيخ عبد القادر الجيلاني رحمه الله بقولهم : يا شيخ عبد القادر الجيلاني شيئا لله والصلوات المنكوسة إلى بغداد وغير ذلك مما لا يعدوهؤلاء عبدة غير الله ما قدروا الله حق قدره ولم يعلم هؤلاء السفهاء أن الشيخ رحمه الله لا يقدر على جلب نفع لأحد ولا دفع ضر عنه مقدار ذرة فلم يستغيثون به ولم يطلبون الحوائج منه ؟ أليس الله بكاف عبده ؟اللهم إنا نعوذ بك من أن نشرك بك أو نعظم أحدا من خلفك كعظمتك قال في ( البزارية ) وغيرها من كتب الفتاوى : ( من قال : إن أرواح المشايخ حاضرة تعلم يكفر )

“From the vilest of evil acts and the greatest of innovations and the most severe inventions is the practice of the people of innovation that they mention Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee, rahimahullaah, by saying: ‘0 Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qaad ir al-Jeelaanee grant us something for the sake of Allaah,’ and they misdirect their prayers to Baghdad, and many other practices.

These people are worshippers of others besides Allaah and they make a totally deficient and unjust estimate of Allaah. These ignorant people do not know that the Shaikh, rahimullah, is not able to bring them an atoms weight of good, nor to remove an atoms weight of evil from them. Why do they call upon him for help and why do they seek their needs from him? Is Allaah not sufficient for His servants?! 0 Allaah we seek Your refuge from associating anything with Your honoring any of Your creation with the honor due to You.” They also state in al-Bazzaariyyah and other books of religious rulings: “Whoever claims that the souls of the Shaikhs are present, and that they know what occurs, has become an Unbeliever.”(end)

source. http://www.kl28.com/forums/t4364.html

  • It is mentioned in Al-Waasitah (p.5):

"ومن أثبت الأنبياء وسواهم من مشايخ العلم والدين وسائط بين الله وبين خلقه كالحُجّاب الذين بين الملك ورعيته بحيث يكونون هم يرفعون إلى الله تعالى حوائج خلقه، وأن الله تعالى إنما يهدي عباده ويرزقهموينصرهم بتوسطهم بمعنى أن الخلق يسألونهم وهم يسألون الله كما أن الوسائط عند الملوك يسألون الملك حوائج الناس لقربهم منهم، والناس يسألونهم أدباً منهم أن يباشروا سؤال الملك ولأن طلبهم من الوسائطأنفع لهم من طلبهم من الملك لكونهم أقرب إلى الملك من الطالب. فمن أثبتهم وسائط على هذا الوجه فهو كافر مشرك يجب أن يستتاب، فإن تاب وإلا قتل، وهؤلاء مشبَّهون لله، شبّهوا الخالق بالمخلوق وجعلوا للهأنداداً".

“Whoever makes the prophets, and the scholars of the religion, intermediaries between Allaah and His creation, like the door keepers employed by earthly kings who come between them and their subjects, and thinks that they are the ones who raise up the needs of the creation to Allaah, the Most High, and that Allaah, the Most High, guides, gives provision and aid to His creation through them, meaning that the creation make request of them and then they in turn make request of Allaah, just as the intermediaries with earthly kings pass on the request of subjects to them, and the people ask them since it is not deemed correct for them to ask the king directly, and it is more beneficial for them to make their request to the intermediaries than to ask the king directly, since they are closer to the king. So whoever deems them to be intermediaries in this way, then he is a Kaafir and a mushrik. His repentance is to be sought, and he either repents or he is killed. Such people make similarity with Allaah; they take Him to be like His creation, and attribute rivals to Allaah...”(end)

  • Its mentioned in Fatawa-e-Bazaaria:قال علماؤنا‏:‏ من قال أرواح المشايخ حاضرة تعلم يكفر

Our Scholars Say, Whoever say that souls of our Mashaaeikhs are Present and knowing have committed Kufr. Source: http://www.al-eman.com/islamlib/viewchp.asp?BID=318&CID=17

  • Muhammad Abid al-Sindi al-Hanafi:

» ما نصه

ولا يقول : يا صاحب القبر ، يا فلان ، إقض حاجتي ، أو سلها من الله ، أو كن لي شفيعا عند الله ، بل يقول : يا من لا يشرك في حكمه أحدا ؛ اقض لي حاجتي هذه

And do not say: YA Sahib al Qabar (O the companion of grave)! O such person, help me in my affair, or be a friend of mine to Allah,' but say: ' O you who no one associates with, help me in this affair'[Tawal`e al-Anwar Sharah Tanweer al-Ansaar ma ad-Durre Mukhtaar]

  • Ibn Abideen said

مطلب في النذر الذي يقع للأموات من أكثر العوام من شمع أو زيت أو نحوه قوله ( تقربا إليهم ) كأن يقول يا سيدي فلان إن رد غائبي أو عوفي مريضي أو قضيت حاجتي فلك من الذهب أو الفضة أو الطعم أو الشمعأو الزيت كذا بحر

قوله ( باطل وحرام ) لوجوه منها أنه نذر لمخلوق والنذر للمخلوق لا يجوز لأنه عبادة والعبادة لا تكون لمخلوق ومنها أن المنذور له ميت والميت لا يملك

ومنها أنه إن ظن أن الميت يتصرف في الأمور

لأمور دون الله تعالى واعتقاده ذلك كفر اللهم إلا إن قال يا الله

إني نذرت لك إن شفيت مريضي أو رددت غائبي أو قضيت حاجتي أن أطعم الفقراء الذين بباب السيدة نفيسة أو الإمام الشافعي أو الإمام الليث أو أشتري حصرا لمساجدهم أو زيتا لوقودها أو دراهم لمن يقوم بشعائرهاإلى غير ذلك مما يكون فيه نفع للفقراء والنذر لله عز وجل

"His saying: {{And know that indeed the vows (nadhr) made to the dead by the majority of the lay-masses and what dirhams, candles, oil and their like are taken at the mausoleums of the noble awliya to gain proximity to them}}... like one says, ‘Oh my such and such a master, if you return that which I have lost or cure my illness or fulfil my need, then for you is a large amount of gold or silver or food or candles or oil or the like.’ His saying: {{This is baseless and haram!}} on account of a few reasons. Among them (those reasons) is that he has promised to the creation and promising to the creation is not permissible because this is a [form of] worship and worship should only be for the creator; and among them is that the person being promised is dead and the dead cannot own; and among them is that if he thinks that the dead person acts freely in issues, leaving Allah Most High. And his belief in that is kufr, oh Allah, except if he says, ‘Oh Allah, surely I promise you - if you cure my illness, or return me my lost possession, or fulfil my need - that I shall feed the poor, who are at the door of Sayyidah Nafisah, or Imam Shafi’i, or Imam Layth etc, from among those things in which there is benefit for the poor and the offering is for Allah". ("Hashiyah Rad al-Mukhtar", 2/439).


No comments:

Post a Comment